Discrimination
Discriminatory language or behaviour must not be
endorsed by the work as a whole. Aggressive
discriminatory language or behaviour is unlikely
to be acceptable unless clearly condemned.
Drugs
Any misuse of drugs must be infrequent and should
not be glamorised or give instructional detail.
Horror
Moderate physical and psychological threat may be
permitted, provided disturbing sequences are not
frequent or sustained.
Imitable behaviour
Dangerous behaviour (for example, hanging, suicide and
self-harming) should not dwell on detail which could be
copied, or appear pain or harm free. Easily accessible
weapons should not be glamorised.
Language
Moderate language is allowed. The use of strong
language (for example, ‘fuck’) must be infrequent.
Nudity
Nudity is allowed, but in a sexual context must be brief
and discreet.
Sex
Sexual activity may be briefly and discreetly portrayed.
Sex references should not go beyond what is suitable for
young teenagers. Frequent crude references are unlikely
to be acceptable.
Theme
Mature themes are acceptable, but their treatment must
be suitable for young teenagers.
Violence
Moderate violence is allowed but should not dwell on
detail. There should be no emphasis on injuries or blood,
but occasional gory moments may be permitted if
justified by the context.
Sexual violence may only be implied or briefly and
discreetly indicated, and must have a strong contextual
justification.
15 –
Suitable only for 15 years
and over
No one younger than 15 may
see a ‘15’ film in a cinema.
No one younger than 15 may
rent or buy a ‘15’ rated
video work.
Discrimination
The work as a whole must not endorse discriminatory
language or behaviour.
Drugs
Drug taking may be shown but the film as a whole must not
promote or encourage drug misuse. The misuse of easily
accessible and highly dangerous substances (for example,
aerosols or solvents) is unlikely to be acceptable.
Horror
Strong threat and menace are permitted unless sadistic
or sexualised.
Imitable behaviour
Dangerous behaviour (for example, hanging, suicide and
self-harming) should not dwell on detail which could be
copied. Easily accessible weapons should not be glamorised.
Language
There may be frequent use of strong language (for example,
‘fuck’). The strongest terms (for example, ‘cunt’) may be
acceptable if justified by the context. Aggressive or repeated
use of the strongest language is unlikely to be acceptable.
Nudity
Nudity may be allowed in a sexual context but without
strong detail. There are no constraints on nudity in a
non-sexual or educational context.
Sex
Sexual activity may be portrayed without strong detail.
There may be strong verbal references to sexual behaviour,
but the strongest references are unlikely to be acceptable
unless justified by context. Works whose primary purpose is
sexual arousal or stimulation are unlikely to be acceptable.
Theme
No theme is prohibited, provided the treatment is
appropriate for 15 year olds.
Violence
Violence may be strong but should not dwell on the infliction
of pain or injury. The strongest gory images are unlikely to
be acceptable. Strong sadistic or sexualised violence is also
unlikely to be acceptable.
There may be detailed verbal references to sexual violence
but any portrayal of sexual violence must be discreet and
have a strong contextual justification.
Suitable only for adults
No-one younger than 18 may
see an ‘18’ film in a cinema.
No-one younger than 18 may
rent or buy an ‘18’ rated video.
In line with the consistent findings of the BBFC’s public
consultations and The Human Rights Act 1998, at ‘18’ the
BBFC’s guideline concerns will not normally override
the principle that adults should be free to choose their
own entertainment. Exceptions are most likely in the
following areas:
• where the material is in breach of the criminal law,
or has been created through the commission of a
criminal offence
• where material or treatment appears to the BBFC to
risk harm to individuals or, through their behaviour,
to society – for example, any detailed portrayal of
violent or dangerous acts, or of illegal drug use,
which may cause harm to public health or morals.
This may include portrayals of sexual or sexualised
violence which might, for example, eroticise or
endorse sexual assault
• where there are more explicit images of sexual
activity which cannot be justified by context. Such
images may be appropriate in ‘R18’ works, and in
‘sex works’ (see below) would normally be confined
to that category.
In the case of video works (including video games),
which may be more accessible to younger viewers,
intervention may be more frequent than for cinema films.
Sex education at ‘18’
Where sex material genuinely seeks to inform and
educate in matters such as human sexuality, safer
sex and health, explicit images of sexual activity may
be permitted.
Sex works at ‘18’
Sex works are works whose primary purpose is sexual
arousal or stimulation. Sex works containing only material
which may be simulated are generally passed ‘18’. Sex
works containing clear images of real sex, strong fetish
material, sexually explicit animated images, or other
very strong sexual images will be confined to the ‘R18’
category. Material which is unacceptable in a sex work
at ‘R18’ is also unacceptable in a sex work at ‘18’.
R18 - To be shown only in
specially licensed cinemas,
or supplied only in licensed sex
shops, and to adults of not less
than 18 years
The ‘R18’ category is a
special and legally restricted
classification primarily for
explicit works of consenting
sex or strong fetish material
involving adults. Films may
only be shown to adults in
specially licensed cinemas,
and video works may be
supplied to adults only in
licensed sex shops. ‘R18’ video
works may not be supplied by
mail order.
The following content is not acceptable:
• any material which is in breach of the criminal law,
including material judged to be obscene under the
current interpretation of the Obscene Publications
Act 1959
• material (including dialogue) likely to encourage an
interest in sexually abusive activity (for example,
paedophilia, incest or rape) which may include adults
role-playing as non-adults
• the portrayal of any sexual activity which involves
lack of consent (whether real or simulated). Any form
of physical restraint which prevents participants from
indicating a withdrawal of consent
• the infliction of pain or acts which may cause lasting
physical harm, whether real or (in a sexual context)
simulated. Some allowance may be made for
moderate, non-abusive, consensual activity
• penetration by any object associated with violence
or likely to cause physical harm
• any sexual threats, humiliation or abuse which does
not form part of a clearly consenting role-playing
game. Strong physical or verbal abuse, even if
consensual, is unlikely to be acceptable.
These Guidelines will be applied to the same
standard regardless of sexual orientation.
Intervention
Where possible, the BBFC deals
with any issues raised in a submitted
work through classification at the
appropriate category. In some cases,
however, assurances, cuts or other
changes (for example, the addition
of warning captions) will be required
as a condition of classification, or
as a condition of classification at
a particular category. In some
circumstances a work may be
rejected, ie refused a classification
at any category. The General Principles
under which such decisions are made
are set out on page 4. Details of
interventions are published on the
main BBFC website.
Cuts for category
If the submitted work is suitable for
classification, but only at a category
higher than that requested by the
submitting company, the BBFC will
consider whether a lower category
could be achieved through relatively
minor or simple changes. If so, the
BBFC may offer the submitting
company a choice of accepting the
higher category or making defined
changes to achieve a lower category.
The decision to offer such ‘cuts for
category’ is at the discretion of the
BBFC and this option is unlikely to be
available if the required changes
would be extensive or complex, or if
the effect of possible changes would
be difficult to predict. In such
circumstances, the submitting
company may choose to make a new
submission of a different version of the work at a later date.
Compulsory cuts
If a submitted work raises issues or
concerns that cannot be addressed by
classification at a particular category,
cuts or other changes may be required
as a condition of classification. Such
intervention is most likely with
regard to the following:
• material which may promote
illegal activity
• material which is obscene or
otherwise illegal
• material created by means of the
commission of a criminal offence
• portrayals of children in a
sexualised or abusive context
• sexual violence or sexualised
violence which endorses or
eroticises the behaviour
• sadistic violence or torture which
invites the viewer to identify with
the perpetrator in a way which
raises a risk of harm
• graphic images of real injury,
violence or death presented in a
salacious or sensationalist manner
which risks harm by encouraging
callous or sadistic attitudes
• sex works which contain material
listed as unacceptable at ‘R18’.
When the issue relates to the
circumstances of filming (for
example, in relation to animal cruelty
or public indecency) the submitting
company will normally be given an
opportunity to present evidence
before a final decision is reached.
Rejects
If a central concept of the work is
unacceptable (for example, a sex
work with a rape theme); or if
intervention in any of the ways
noted above is not acceptable to
the submitting company; or if the
changes required would be extensive
or complex; the work may be
rejected, ie refused a classification
at any category.
Tuesday 18 January 2011
Thursday 13 January 2011
Further research on classification
All classification decisions are based on the BBFC’s published and regularly updated Guidelines. The Guidelines are the product of extensive public consultation, research and the accumulated experience of the BBFC over many years. They reflect current views on film, DVD and video game regulation.
In the most recent consultation over 8700 members of the public were asked for their views on classification – including consideration of issues such as language, discrimination, violence, sex and drugs in films, DVDs and video games, parental concerns about younger viewers and recent BBFC decisions. The Guidelines also take into account the various UK laws which the BBFC must consider and apply when making classification decisions.
Through further research into classification I have downloaded the BBFC guidelines.
bbfcThe Guidelines
Introduction1.The British Board of Film
Classification (BBFC) is an
independent, non-governmental body
funded through the fees it charges to
those who submit films and video
works for classification. Here, and
throughout the Guidelines, video
works are taken to include video
games, and films and programmes
released on DVD or Blu-ray, or
distributed by means of download
or streaming on the internet.
2.The BBFC classifies films on behalf
of the local authorities who license
cinemas under the Licensing Act 2003.
3.The BBFC classifies video works
which are released as video
recordings under the Video
Recordings Act 1984. (The video
games covered by the VRA are those
whose exemption is forfeited under
section 2(2) because they depict
human sexual activity, gross violence
or other matters of concern.)
4.The BBFC classifies video works
which are distributed other than as
a video recording (for example, by
means of download or streaming
over the internet) under a voluntary
scheme called BBFC.online.
5.The BBFC will not classify material
which it believes to be in breach of
the criminal law.
6.Where possible the BBFC will
carry out its responsibilities through
appropriate use of the classification
categories, particularly in order to
protect children from any harm
which may be caused. If necessary,
however, the BBFC may cut or even
reject a film or video work. The
BBFC’s approach to material which
is unacceptable at any category is
set out in the ‘Intervention’ section
of these Guidelines on page 32.
7. In line with domestic administrative
law principles and the requirements
of the Human Rights Act 1998, there
is a particular need to make the
classification criteria clear. This is
fulfilled by the publication of these
Guidelines and their availability on
the BBFC website (www.bbfc.co.uk)
or directly from the BBFC. (Contact
details can be found on the back cover.)
8.The BBFC Classification Guidelines
reflect all these considerations and are
the product of public consultation with
children and adults, research and the
accumulated experience of the BBFC
over many years. The Guidelines,
and the BBFC’s practice in applying
them, have particular regard to any
changes in public taste, attitudes and
concerns; changes in the law; or new
evidence from research or expert
sources; and will be reviewed
periodically.
9.The Guidelines, however, are not
a legal document and should be
interpreted in the spirit of what is
intended as well as in the letter. They
cannot be a comprehensive account
of everything that may at any time
be of concern. Should issues arise
which are not specifically covered
here, they will be dealt with by the
BBFC on their merits and in line with
the standards expressed and implied
in these Guidelines.
10. Responsibility for the Guidelines
and for their interpretation rests with
the BBFC and is subject to normal
considerations of fairness and
reasonableness.
11.The BBFC undertakes to provide
guidance on the interpretation of
these Guidelines on request.
12. Before allowing a child to view
a work, parents are advised to
consider carefully the classification,
together with any accompanying
Consumer Advice.
General Principles
The detail of the Guidelines is
contained in the following pages.
But it is right to set out here the
general underlying grounds on
which the BBFC exercises the broad
discretion conferred on it. There are
two guiding principles:
• that works should be allowed
to reach the widest audience
that is appropriate for their
theme and treatment
• that adults should, as far as
possible, be free to choose
what they see, provided that it
remains within the law and is
not potentially harmful.
When applying these guiding
principles, there are three main
qualifications:
1. whether the material is in conflict
with the law, or has been created
through the commission of a
criminal offence
2. whether the material, either on
its own, or in combination with other
content of a similar nature, may
cause any harm at the category
concerned. This includes not just
any harm that may result from the
behaviour of potential viewers, but
also any ‘moral harm’ that may becaused by, for example, desensitising
a potential viewer to the effects of
violence, degrading a potential
viewer’s sense of empathy,
encouraging a dehumanised view
of others, suppressing pro-social
attitudes, encouraging anti-social
attitudes, reinforcing unhealthy
fantasies, or eroding a sense of
moral responsibility. Especially with
regard to children, harm may also
include retarding social and moral
development, distorting a viewer’s
sense of right and wrong, and limiting
their capacity for compassion
3.whether the availability of the
material, at the age group concerned,
is clearly unacceptable to broad
public opinion. It is on this ground,
for example, that the BBFC
intervenes in respect of bad language.
In assessing legal issues, potential
harm or acceptability to broad public
opinion, the BBFC takes account of
relevant research and expert opinion.
However, such research and expert
opinion is often lacking, imperfect,
disputed, inconclusive or contradictory.
In many cases the BBFC must
therefore rely on its collective
experience and expertise to make a
judgement as to the suitability of a
work for classification, or for
classification at a particular category.
Legal Considerations
Human Rights Act 1998
Among the rights established under
this Act are the right of respect for
private and family life, and the right
to freedom of expression. When
classifying works, the BBFC will
have regard to the impact of any
decision on the rights of any relevant
person. The Act permits such
restrictions on freedom of expression
as are prescribed by law and are
necessary in a democratic society,
in the interests of national security,
territorial integrity or public safety,
for the prevention of disorder or
crime, for the protection of health
or morals, for the protection of the
reputation or rights of others, for
preventing the disclosure of
information received in confidence,
or for maintaining the authority and
impartiality of the judiciary.
The Licensing Act 2003
Cinemas require a licence from the
local authority in which they operate.
The licence must include a condition
requiring the admission of children
(under 18) to any film to be restricted
in accordance with the
recommendations of the BBFC or
the licensing authority.
5
The objectives of the Licensing Act
are:
• the prevention of crime
and disorder
• public safety
• the prevention of public nuisance
• the protection of children
from harm.
The Video Recordings Act 1984
Video works (including films, TV
programmes and video games)
which are supplied on a disc, tape or
any other device capable of storing
data electronically must be classified
by the BBFC unless they fall within
the definition of an exempted work.
When considering whether to award
a classification certificate to a work,
or whether to classify a work at a
particular category, the BBFC is
required by the Act to have special
regard (among the other relevant
factors) to the likelihood of works
being viewed in the home, and to any
harm that may be caused to potential
viewers or, through their behaviour,
to society by the manner in which the
work deals with:
• criminal behaviour
• illegal drugs
• violent behaviour or incidents
• horrific behaviour or incidents
• human sexual activity.
In considering these issues the BBFC
has in mind the possible effect not
only on children but also on other
vulnerable people.
The Obscene Publications Act
1959 & 1964
It is illegal to publish a work which is
obscene. A work is obscene if, taken
as a whole, it has a tendency to
deprave and corrupt (ie, make
morally bad) a significant proportion
of those likely to see it. However, no
offence is committed if publication
is justified as being for the public
good on the grounds that it is in the
interests of science, art, literature
or learning or other objects of
general concern.
Criminal Justice and
Immigration Act 2008
It is illegal to be in possession
of an extreme pornographic image.
An extreme pornographic image is
one which is pornographic and
grossly offensive, disgusting
or otherwise of an obscene character,
which features an apparently real
person, and which portrays, in an
explicit and realistic way, an act
which: threatens a person’s life;
results, or is likely to result, in
serious injury to a person’s anus,
breasts or genitals; involves
sexual interference with a human
corpse; or involves bestiality. Works
classified by the BBFC under the
Video Recordings Act are excluded
from the scope of the offence.
The Protection of Children Act 1978
It is illegal to make, distribute, show
or possess indecent photographs or
pseudo-photographs of a child. It is
also illegal to make, distribute, show
or possess indecent images of
children which have been derived
from a photograph or pseudophotograph
(for example, by tracing).
A child is defined as a person under
the age of 18.
The Sexual Offences Act 2003
It is illegal to expose oneself with
intent to cause alarm or distress – this
offence augments the common law
misdemeanour of indecent exposure.
The Act also prohibits a person
recording the private act of another,
where the intention of the recording
is for the sexual gratification of
himself or a third party and where the
recorded party has not consented to
so being filmed.
The Public Order Act 1986
It is illegal to distribute, show or
play to the public a recording of
visual images or sounds which are7
The Tobacco Advertising
and Promotion Act 2002
It is illegal, in the course of a
business, to publish a tobacco
advertisement.
Other unlawful material
In carrying out its responsibilities,
the BBFC will have regard to whether
the material itself appears to be
unlawful in the United Kingdom,
or has arisen from the commission
of an unlawful act.
threatening, abusive or insulting if
the intention is to stir up racial hatred
or hatred on the grounds of sexual
orientation, or if racial hatred or
hatred on the grounds of sexual
orientation is likely to be stirred up.
It is also illegal to distribute, show
or play to the public a recording of
visual images or sounds which are
threatening if the intention is to stir
up religious hatred.
The Cinematograph Films
(Animals) Act 1937
It is illegal to show any scene
‘organised or directed’ for the
purposes of the film that involves
actual cruelty to animals. This Act
applies to the exhibition of films
in public cinemas but the BBFC also
applies the same test to video works.
For the purposes of this legislation
and The Animal Welfare Act 2006, only
vertebrates which are domesticated
or otherwise under the control of man
are defined as ‘animals’.
The Animal Welfare Act 2006
It is illegal to supply, publish or show
or possess with intent to supply a
video recording of an ‘animal fight’
that has taken place within Great
Britain since 6 April 2007.
Consumer Advice
The BBFC’s Consumer Advice enables
the public to make informed choices
about the films, DVDs and interactive
works available to them.
Consumer Advice is a brief
description of the content which
determined the classification
of a film, DVD or video game.
As well as noting particular issues
such as violence, sex, language,
drugs or any other matters likely to
be of concern, it can also highlight
themes, such as suicide, or contexts,
such as comedy or fantasy, which can
influence the strength of the material.
At the junior categories Consumer
Advice can also warn of behaviour
which may be potentially harmful if
copied, or highlight content, such as
characters in dangerous situations,
which might frighten or upset
younger viewers.
Consumer Advice indicates the
strength of individual issues by using
the terms ‘mild’, ‘moderate’, ‘strong’
and ‘very strong’, across the
categories. For example, language
at ‘U’ and ‘PG’ is likely to be ‘mild’
while at ‘15’ and ‘18’ language can
be ‘strong’ and ‘very strong’. Where
relevant, the frequency with which
the issue appears in the work is
also indicated.
With the co-operation of the film and
video industry, Consumer Advice is
routinely displayed on both film
advertising, including posters, on
print media and television, and on
packaging for video works.
On film posters, the Consumer
Advice should be found in a box
near the film’s title, alongside the
classification, for example:
On DVDs or video games
classified by the BBFC, Consumer
Advice should be found on the back
of the packaging, alongside the
classification symbol, for example:
Consumer Advice is also
available on the BBFC websites,
www.bbfc.co.uk and
www.pbbfc.co.uk.
Extended
Classification Information
For cinema films classified
after July 2007, and video games
classified after September 2007, the
BBFC website also carries Extended
Classification Information (ECI).
ECI provides, over several
paragraphs, a more detailed
explanation of the classification
issues that defined the work’s
category. It also notes any
additional content which did not
determine the classification
but may be of interest to the likely
audience.
The Parents BBFC website also
provides detailed content information
tailored specifically for parents
and guardians. It is designed for
adults who want a more detailed
understanding of the issues they are
likely to find in a film, DVD or video
game before they allow a child to see
or play it. Parents BBFC can be found
at www.pbbfc.co.uk.
12ACONTAINS MODERATE HORROR AND
COMIC ACTION-ADVENTURE VIOLENCE
CONTAINS FREQUENT STRONG
BLOODY VIOLENCE AND VERY
STRONG LANGUAGE
Suitable for persons of 18 years and over.
Not to be supplied to any person below that age
9.
• the original production date of
the work. For example, outdated
attitudes which might be
considered offensive in a
contemporary work may be
treated more leniently in a much
older, and obviously dated, work
• any special merits of the work.
Tone and impact
The overall tone of a work may also
affect the classification decision.
While the presentation of specific
issues, such as sex and violence, may
not be problematic at a particular
category, if the work has a generally
dark or unsettling tone that may
disturb the audience at that category,
then it may receive a more restrictive
classification. At the junior categories,
and on the borderline between
categories, such considerations as
the degree of fantasy; the level of
connection to the real world; and the
extent to which the work presents a
despairing view of the world or lacks
a clear moral perspective may be
important factors. The impact of a
work (ie, how it makes the audience
feel) is also taken into account, for
example in relation to horror films
where threat may be more significant
than violence.
Release format
Classification decisions may be
stricter on video works than on film.
This is on account of the increased
possibility of under-age viewing or
game playing recognised in the Video
Recordings Act, and of works being
replayed or viewed out of context.
Accordingly, a video work may
occasionally receive a higher
classification than on film, or
require new or different cuts.
Main Issues
This section of the Guidelines
identifies some concerns which apply,
to a greater or a lesser degree, at all
classification levels. It sets out the
general approach taken with regard
to such concerns, given the general
principles set out earlier.
The pages following this section
provide specific guidance for ‘U’
through to ‘18’ under the heading
‘The Categories’. The guidance there
should be read in the light of the more
general advice offered here and under
‘Overarching Factors’ and ‘General
Principles’.
Discrimination
Potentially offensive content, relating
to such matters as race, gender,
religion, disability or sexuality, may
arise in a wide range of works, and
the classification decision will
take account of the strength or impact
of its inclusion. The context in which
such content may appear also has a
bearing on the classification. Works
with such content may receive a
less restrictive category where
discriminatory language and
behaviour is implicitly or explicitly
criticised; or the work as a whole
seeks to challenge such attitudes,
or is obviously dated.
Drugs
No work taken as a whole may
promote the misuse of drugs and any
detailed portrayal of drug misuse
likely to promote or glamorise the
activity may be cut. Works which
show drug misuse while emphasising
the dangers may receive less
restrictive classifications than works
that present drug misuse in a neutral
manner.
Where smoking, alcohol abuse or
substance misuse feature to a
significant extent in works which
appeal to children, this will
normally be indicated in the
Consumer Advice and/or Extended.
Classification decisions will also
take into account any promotion or
glamorisation of such activities.
Horror
The use of frightening elements
which might scare or unsettle an
audience is part of a long tradition of
story telling and film making. Many
children enjoy the excitement of
scary sequences, but, where films
are targeted at a younger audience,
classification decisions will take into
account such factors as the frequency,
length and detail of scary scenes as
well as horror effects, including
music and sound, and whether there
is a swift and reassuring outcome.
Older audiences often pay to see
horror films because they like being
frightened or shocked and such works
are classified at an appropriate
category to ensure that the young
and vulnerable are protected from
too intense an experience.
Imitable behaviour
Classification decisions will take into
account any detailed portrayal of
criminal and violent techniques, and
any glamorisation of easily accessible
weapons, such as knives. Works which
portray anti-social behaviour (for
example, bullying) uncritically are
likely to receive a more restrictive
classification. Works which, taken as
a whole, actively promote illegal
behaviour will be cut or rejected.
Portrayals of potentially dangerous
behaviour (especially relating to
hanging, suicide and self-harm)
which children and young people
are likely to copy, will be cut if a
more restrictive classification is
not appropriate.
Language
Many people are offended, some of
them deeply, by bad language. This
may include the use of expletives
with a sexual, religious or racial
association, offensive language about
minority groups and commonly
understood rude gestures. The extent
of that offence may vary according to
age, gender, race, background,
beliefs and expectations brought by
viewers to the work, as well as the
context in which the word, expression
or gesture is used.
For these reasons, it is impossible to
set out comprehensive lists of words,
expressions or gestures which are
acceptable at each category. The
advice at different classification
levels, therefore, provides general
guidance taking account of the views
expressed in public consultation
exercises.
Works which feature the following
are likely to receive more restrictive
classifications: portrayal of violence
as a normal solution to problems,
heroes who inflict pain and injury,
callousness towards victims, the
encouragement of aggressive
attitudes, and content which depicts
characters taking pleasure in pain
or humiliation.
Sexualised violence or works which
glorify or glamorise violence will
receive a more restrictive
classification and may even be cut.
A strict policy on sexual violence and
rape is applied. Content which might
eroticise or endorse sexual violence
may require cuts at any classification
level. This is more likely with video
works than film because of the
potential for replaying scenes out
of context. Any association of sex with
non-consensual restraint, pain or
humiliation may be cut.
Titles
If the title of a work incites hatred on
grounds of race, religion or sexual
orientation, or incites other criminal
behaviour; or encourages an interest
in abusive or illegal sexual activity,
changes will be required as a
condition of classification.
If the title of a work is likely to cause
significant offence to a significant
number of people if displayed in a
public place, the distributor will be
advised to consider carefully the
places in which it is likely to be seen
and to take appropriate action,
for example by obscuring certain
words on packaging or marketing
materials. (This advice is not given
in relation to works classified ‘R18’
as such works can only be supplied
or offered for supply in a licensed sex
shop.) In extreme cases, assurances
on public display of the full title, or
changes to the title, may be required
as a condition of classification.
Photo or pattern sensitivity, motion
sickness and reactions to low
frequency sound
A small number of viewers are
sensitive to flashing and flickering
light, or some shapes and patterns,
and may experience seizures or other
serious physical effects. In addition,
some viewers experience feelings of
motion sickness or other symptoms
when viewing works which feature
hand held or otherwise moving
camerawork, or which feature very
low frequency sounds.
It is the responsibility of film makers
and distributors to identify works inwhich such issues may arise and
to ensure that, when required,
appropriate warnings are given
to viewers.
Such effects are therefore not normally
taken into account when reaching a
classification decision. However, if it
is obvious during viewing that the
work is highly likely to affect a
significant number of viewers, the
BBFC may advise the distributor of
the need to ensure that appropriate
warnings are in place. In extreme
cases, assurances regarding the
display of appropriate warnings
may be required as a condition of
classification.
Trailers/advertisements
Audiences actively choose to see
a full length feature based on
expectations of the particular genre
at the given classification and on the
Consumer Advice and Extended
Classification Information provided by
the BBFC. In contrast, audiences have
no choice about the accompanying
trailers or advertisements which may
be very different in tone and content
to the film the audience has chosen to
view. In addition, because trailers and
advertisements are short and
self-contained, borderline material is
less likely to be justified by context
and more likely to cause offence.
For these reasons, classification
decisions for trailers and
advertisements may be more
restrictive than for equivalent
material in a main feature, for
example:
• strong language is not permitted
in trailers or advertisements at
any category below ‘15’
• only one use of strong language
is permitted in a trailer or
advertisement at ‘15’ and must be
neither threatening nor aggressive.
Advertisements for alcohol of any
type can be passed at any category.
However, these may receive a more
restrictive classification if there are
overt attempts to associate alcohol
with sexual prowess and/or a
glamorous or successful lifestyle.
Advertisements for tobacco
are prohibited by law.
The BBFC is not responsible for the
exhibition of cinema trailers and
advertisements, including alcohol
advertising, and has no involvement
in deciding which films they appear
before. This process is the
responsibility of the cinema.
Public information
advertisements/charity
advertisements
Where an advertisement is part of a
public information campaign or has
a charitable purpose, the more
restrictive approach set out above
will not normally apply. However,
potentially shocking or offensive
content in such advertisements must
not go beyond what is likely to be
acceptable to the particular audience.
Video games
Video games are classified under the
same Guidelines and using the same
categories as ‘linear’ works such as
film or DVD.
The BBFC acknowledges the difference
between watching a film or DVD and
the more interactive experience of
playing a game but recognises that,
to date, limited research has been
done into whether ‘interactivity’ has
any significant effect on the potential
for harm.
In addition, the interactivity inherent
in video games may, in certain
contexts, lead to a greater potential
for some content to be considered
unsuitable for certain age groups.
The ability of a game to make a
young player complicit in behaviour
involving, for example, sex, drugs or
realistic violence, may be as
important as the level of detail shown,
especially where such behaviour
forms a major component of the
game, and where the level of
interactivity is high.
In a video game, the frequency with
which an issue occurs is also often
difficult to quantify, as it will depend
on how the player chooses to play
the game, and how many times a
particular level is attempted before
completion. Where frequency is a
category defining issue (for example,
with respect to strong language), the
BBFC bases its judgement on an
assessment of the frequency with
which a player is likely to encounter
the issue during normal gameplay.
Given the lack of research,
especially in relation to harm, and
given the rapid developments in the
sophistication of video games, the
BBFC may take a more cautious
approach when a video game lies on
the borderline between two categories,
or contains material which raises
issues of acceptability at the adult
categories.
The Categories
The BBFC endeavours to classify
submitted works in one of the
following categories:
guidance on how the main
issues (for example, sex and
violence) are specifically
applied from ‘U’ through to
‘R18’. The criteria should be
read in the light of the general
approach set out earlier
under ‘General Principles’,
‘Overarching Factors’ and
‘Main Issues’.
Because works from time to
time present issues in ways
which cannot be anticipated,
these criteria will not be
applied in an over-literal way
if such an interpretation would
lead to an outcome which would
confound audience expectations.
U Universal –
Suitable for all
It is impossible to predict what
might upset any particular
child. But a ‘U’ film should be
suitable for audiences aged four
years and over. ‘U’ films should
be set within a positive moral
framework and should offer
reassuring counterbalances to
any violence, threat or horror.
If a work is particularly suitable
for a pre-school child to view
alone, this will be indicated in
the Consumer Advice.
Discrimination
No discriminatory language or behaviour unless
clearly disapproved of.
Drugs
No references to illegal drugs or drug misuse unless
they are infrequent and innocuous, or there is a clear
educational purpose or anti-drug message suitable
for young children.
Horror
Scary sequences should be mild, brief and unlikely to
cause undue anxiety to young children. The outcome
should be reassuring.
Imitable behaviour
No potentially dangerous behaviour which young
children are likely to copy. No emphasis on realistic
or easily accessible weapons.
Language
Infrequent use only of very mild bad language.
Nudity
Occasional natural nudity, with no sexual context.
Sex
Mild sexual behaviour (for example, kissing) and
references only (for example, to ‘making love’).
Theme
While problematic themes may be present, their
treatment must be sensitive and appropriate for
young children.
Violence
Mild violence only. Occasional mild threat or
menace only.
PG Parental Guidance –
General viewing, but some
scenes may be unsuitable
for young children
Unaccompanied children of
any age may watch. A ‘PG’
film should not disturb a child
aged around eight or older.
However, parents are advised
to consider whether the content
may upset younger or more
sensitive children.
Discrimination
Discriminatory language or behaviour is unlikely to
be acceptable unless clearly disapproved of or in an
educational or historical context. Discrimination by
a character with which children can readily identify
is unlikely to be acceptable.
Drugs
References to illegal drugs or drug misuse must be
innocuous or carry a suitable anti-drug message.
Horror
Frightening sequences should not be prolonged or
intense. Fantasy settings may be a mitigating factor.
Imitable behaviour
No detail of potentially dangerous behaviour which
young children are likely to copy. No glamorisation
of realistic or easily accessible weapons.
Language
Mild bad language only.
Nudity
Natural nudity, with no sexual context.
Sex
Sexual activity may be implied, but should be
discreet and infrequent. Mild sex references and
innuendo only.
Theme
Where more serious issues are featured (for example,
domestic violence) nothing in their treatment should
condone unacceptable behaviour.
Violence
Moderate violence, without detail, may be allowed,
if justified by its context (for example, history,
comedy or fantasy).
12A/12 –
Suitable for 12 years and over
Exactly the same criteria are
used to classify works at ‘12A’
and ‘12’. These categories are
awarded where the material is
suitable, in general, only for
those aged 12 and over. Works
classified at these categories
may upset children under 12
or contain material which many
parents will find unsuitable
for them.
The ‘12A’ category exists only
for cinema films. No one younger
than 12 may see a ‘12A’ film in a
cinema unless accompanied by
an adult, and films classified
‘12A’ are not recommended for a
child below 12. An adult may take
a younger child if, in their
judgement, the film is suitable
for that particular child. In such
circumstances, responsibility for
allowing a child under 12 to view
lies with the accompanying adult.
The ‘12’ category exists only for
video works. No one younger than
12 may rent or buy a ‘12’ rated
video work.
Classification
Within a group discussion we have decided to classfify our documentary as a 15 certificate, this decision was made as the level of information included would not be appreciated or understood by younger children. This is documentary doesn't include any viloence to therefore this can be viewed by young watchers but with parent acceptance. BBFC classification covering films aimed at teenagers | |
 | |
 The 15 certificate was introduced by the British Board of Film Censors on 1 November 1982, following an overhaul of its classifications as recommended by the Williams Committee. It is currently defined as follows: Passed only for persons of fifteen years and over. No person apparently under the age of 15 years shall be admitted to any exhibition at which there is to be shown any film which has received a '15' certificate from the British Board of Film Classification. It was a direct replacement for the AA certificate, the only difference being that the age limit was raised from fourteen to fifteen. In 1985, following the recommendations of the 1984 Video Recordings Act, the 15 certificate was extended to cover video releases. While the increased age limit allowed the BBFC to be more lenient with regard to classifying certain films, it became clear towards the end of the 1980s that an additional classification was needed between 15 and PG, as Hollywood in particular was producing an increasing number of films aimed specifically at young teenagers. Since these films were considered too strong for a PG, they were usually given a 15 certificate, thus preventing their natural audience from seeing them. As a result of increasingly public debate over this issue, the BBFC introduced the 12 certificate in 1989. The BBFC permits the following within the bounds of the 15 certificate: Theme: No theme is prohibited, provided the treatment is appropriate to 15 year olds. |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)